Money Confidence Is Agency, Not Arithmetic
- 7 hours ago
- 3 min read
By Kristin Marquet
I was never bad at budgeting or managing money. I understood numbers early, tracked expenses carefully, and knew exactly what was coming in and going out without being overwhelmed. On paper, I was disciplined. Where things quietly unraveled wasn’t in spreadsheets; it was in those one-off, impulsive behaviors.
When pressure built or momentum felt uncertain, I’d sometimes overcorrect by spending on things that were extraneous. Not recklessly, and not irresponsibly, but symbolically. Shopping became a way to feel ahead, prepared, or momentarily in control. It wasn’t about excess. It was about relief.
What I didn’t recognize then was that budgeting alone isn’t the same as money confidence. I had structure, but I hadn’t fully claimed agency. I could manage money and large budgets quite well, but I hadn’t yet learned how to lead with it.
Early in my career, I priced my work based on the effort required. Hours worked. Energy spent. How demanding something felt. I believed that if I stayed disciplined, generous, and adaptable, the business would stabilize on its own. Instead, I found myself negotiating against myself before anyone else ever did. I discounted strategically important work to make the client feel good about our collaboration, said yes too quickly, allowing scope creep, and carried low-level anxiety into decisions that should have been neutral.
I was doing what many women are taught to do: be responsible, be flexible, be grateful. But responsibility without authority creates quiet tension. I was technically “good with money,” yet emotionally reactive around it, especially when it came to pricing, collecting revenue, and growth decisions.
The turning point came when I stopped pricing based on effort and started pricing based on outcomes and margin. That shift didn’t just improve revenue—it changed my relationship with money entirely. I stopped asking, What is this worth based on my time? and started asking, What does this need to produce to support the business I’m building?
I backed that decision with clean financial guardrails: clear profit targets, a non-negotiable cash buffer, and a simplified offer ladder that made my value explicit. Nothing fancy. Nothing overly complex. Just clarity.
Once those systems were in place, something unexpected happened. The impulse behaviors disappeared. I didn’t need spending as a release valve anymore because the business itself felt contained, predictable, and intentional. Money stopped being something I managed defensively and became something I directed.
That clarity changed how I led.
Decisions became calmer. I stopped reacting to short-term fluctuations and started planning long-term with confidence. Boundaries held without explanation. Hiring improved because I knew exactly what the business could support. Saying no stopped feeling scary and started feeling strategic.
Money literacy, I’ve learned, doesn’t just affect revenue; it also affects leadership presence. When you understand your pricing, cash flow, and tradeoffs deeply enough, you stop compensating in quiet ways. You stop overgiving. You stop the scope creep. You stop overthinking. You stop making fear-based decisions dressed up as flexibility.
What I wish more women had understood earlier is that wealth isn’t built solely through restraint. It’s built through ownership, systems, and consistency. Budgeting matters, but agency matters more. The real unlock isn’t perfection; it’s learning the language of money early enough to protect your time, your options, and your negotiating power.
Money confidence isn’t about being “good with numbers” or knowing basic arithmetic. It’s about being grounded enough to make decisions without flinching, even when there’s not much information to consider, and trusting yourself to hold them. When that shift happens, leadership follows naturally. And the business finally feels like something you’re steering, not something you’re bracing for.
Connect With Kristin
Comments