top of page

When I Stopped Dimming Myself and Why It Changed Everything

  • Mar 5
  • 4 min read

By Waukeshia Jackson


I do not know that there was a single moment when I decided to stop dimming myself. There was no dramatic confrontation or clean turning point. The decision came slowly.


What I can point to is a moment of clarity. One meeting that made a pattern visible.


Before that, I got tired.


Tired of editing myself in rooms where I was already qualified.

Tired of doing extra work just to make other people comfortable with my presence.

Tired of realizing that no matter how careful I was, someone would still have an opinion.


For a long time, I believed that was simply what professionalism looked like. You keep your head down. You stay prepared. You do not rock the boat. Especially as a woman. Especially as a woman who does not fit the default image people often associate with leadership.


I believed that working hard and making myself easier to accept was part of the job. I did not question that belief. I built my habits around it.


The shift began when I noticed something uncomfortable. I was working incredibly hard, but I was not always being seen clearly. People knew I was capable, but they did not always know who I was. And part of that was on me. I was managing myself instead of owning myself.


I was spending more energy trying not to be misunderstood than actually doing the work I was good at. That realization stayed with me longer than I expected.


What Helped Me Claim My Power

What helped was not affirmations or a sudden change in personality. It was clarity.


I was trained as an engineer, earned an MBA, and later became an attorney. My thinking was shaped in environments where precision matters, where assumptions are questioned, and where being able to defend your reasoning is part of the work. I learned early to anticipate gaps, account for risk, and show my work.


That training followed me into leadership spaces. I carried an unspoken belief that effort and preparation needed reinforcement. So I managed how I showed up.


I now recognize that behavior for what it was: strategic over-justification.


I would add context, anticipate objections, and provide evidence before anyone asked for it. I was not doubting my ideas. I was trying to make them easier to receive. I believed that if I answered every possible question in advance, my thinking would be taken seriously.


On the surface, it looked like preparation. And in many ways, it was. Precision mattered. The stakes were real. But over time, I began to see the cost. By over-justifying, I was doing extra work to earn credibility I already had.


Clarity did not come from reflection or reassurance. It came from contrast.


I was in a meeting where a decision was being made. I had already done the analysis. I understood the risks, the constraints, and the likely outcome. When it was my turn to speak, I laid out my reasoning carefully. I added context. I anticipated questions that had not yet been asked.


Then someone else spoke.


They stated the same conclusion I had reached. Fewer words. No qualifiers. No advance explanations.


The room moved.

The decision was made.

Nothing about the idea had changed. Only the delivery.


That moment clarified something I had not questioned before. I was not being unclear. I was engaging in strategic over-justification to make my thinking easier to receive.


Letting go of that habit did not make me reckless. It made me more effective. I stopped building a case every time I spoke. I trusted that my credibility could exist without constant reinforcement.


That meeting did more than change how I spoke. It changed how I understood leadership.


I realized that the way I had been showing up was not just a personal habit. It was a leadership posture. By over-justifying, I was signaling that certainty needed permission. That insight stayed with me because it explained more than one moment.


It explained why so many capable women are present but not fully heard.


What I learned is simple but uncomfortable. Leadership is not only about having the right answer. It is about how much authority you allow yourself to carry when you deliver it.


What Unapologetic Leadership Actually Looks Like

Unapologetic leadership is not about bravado. It is about alignment.


Women lead unapologetically when they stop performing and start deciding. Deciding what they say yes to. Deciding how much access people get to their time and energy. Deciding that their voice does not need to sound like anyone else’s to be valid.


One of the biggest traps for women is believing that opportunity comes from being agreeable. So we say yes to everything. We take on more than our share. We delay our own growth because we believe patience will eventually be rewarded. Sometimes it is. Often, it just leads to burnout.


Leading unapologetically means being selective. It means understanding that boundaries do not make you difficult. They make you sustainable. It means trusting that you do not need to soften your intelligence or dilute your presence to be effective.


I still care deeply about doing good work. I still value collaboration. But I no longer shape myself around other people’s comfort levels. I show up as I am. Experienced. Thoughtful. Direct. And I let that be enough.


When women lead this way, we do not just change how we are seen. We change what leadership looks like for the women coming next.


Connect With Waukeshia

Instagram: @iamwdjackson

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page