Writing Believable Characters
- 3 days ago
- 4 min read
By Alan Warren
One of the most challenging aspects of storytelling is designing characters that resemble real people—and dialogue that sounds like genuine human dialogue. Readers can put up with a slow plot or clunky clunkiness or a cliché, but won’t stop caring what happens to characters with flat wooden parts. Believability is what turns words on a page into a living world in the reader’s mind. Real characters come from within, not from outside details.
To make characters seem believable, writers often start by thinking about a character’s age, job, or appearance. But what truly drives a character is what they want, fear, or how they see the world. Just as important is the lie they tell themselves—the kind of blindness or emotional flaw
that shapes their choices. For example, a detective who drinks too much is a stereotype. But a detective who drinks because she feels she must carry every victim’s pain alone feels real.
Behavior is most believable when caused by emotional rationality. In real life, people can be rife with contradictions, just as fictional characters must be by principle. A ruthless crime boss may be gentle with his daughter. A shy librarian could be secretly hungry for trouble. Those contrasts provide depth and help reduce the feeling that characters are boiled down to a single trait. No, tension — rather than looking at someone as brave, jealous, or funny. Someone can be brave in public but fearful in private, loyal to friends but unable to trust themselves, friendly to strangers and cruel to family. Contradictions allow characters to assert the unpredictable, and unpredictability is absolute.
While contradictions add complexity, a character’s backstory adds another layer. It shapes how they act, but it’s most effective when shown subtly. You don’t need extended flashbacks to reveal the past. Instead, let history show through small actions. For example, someone who grew up poor might get upset about wasted food, save money, or feel uneasy in fancy places. When readers connect these behaviors to a character’s past, the character feels more real. Backstory is like an iceberg; readers see only a small part, but its hidden depths give it power.
Believable characters also tend to focus more on flaws than on strengths. The ideal characters seem awkward and inhuman, and the imperfect characters seem human. Real flaws are meaningful flaws that matter, that affect choices, that are sources of tension, and that are associated with feelings. A flaw that isn’t problematic or costly is merely decoration. By depicting a character’s flaw as something that crushes their relationships, drives their decisions, or adds to the conflict behind a character’s tale, readers begin to understand people and what they are actually painfully relatable to: human imperfection.
One explanation, indeed, is why so much of what we know about stories disappears in dialogue. But making a dialogue sound real doesn’t mean you’re copying the real world. Real speech is a series of rambling, rehashing, and filler words. These conversations are much more genuine when they are true. Fictional dialogue should sound like actual dialogue but tend toward a more methodical, directed, and deliberate tone. People rarely say precisely how they think they’re feeling. No, instead of saying, “I am so angry that you lied to me,” it’s more natural to say, “You really expect me to believe that?”
Emotion usually finds expression better through hints than through saying it outright. Many voices within the community are necessary. You can remove the words from the dialogue tags, but it’s still important that readers know who is speaking.
Voice is not only the voice, but it is the voice of background, personality, and attitude. One character, for example, might use short, incisive sentences; another one might use longer, much more precise ones. Her professor may say, “That’s statistically unlikely,” while a mechanic might say, “Yeah, that’s not gonna happen.” It is of the same importance, but in their delivery, they signal who they are.
Subtext plays another important role in natural dialogue. A good conversation has less to do with what characters can share than with what they refuse to say. Two people squabbling over dirty dishes might say they disagree on respect or taking care of each other emotionally.
Casual, “Working late again?” might sound like “Are you avoiding me?” So much tension is achieved by giving characters time to address the fundamental issue, without making each character feel like an afterthought in a single line, and by allowing the reader to have more fun reading between the lines.
Talking is also more believable when it’s lived in the physical world. Characters move, they react, they get distracted. Long speeches without breaks generally sound more like theater than dialogue. Small actions — or reactions alone — that interrupt dialogue add a lived sense of place to scenes. And an unpolished character who brushes his head or rubs his finger on their temples midway through a sentence could just as well be stopping to gaze out a window.
Another big one, well, human beings are often mistaken. They misunderstand, misinterpret each other, assume the worst, excuse wrongdoing, and misapprehend motivations. These emotions make people comfortable with being wrong, creating something of an organic conflict. Readers might feel overwhelmed, but they don’t abandon reading because the mistakes feel human rather than propelled by the plot. Perhaps the easiest way to improve dialogue is to read it out loud. If a line is hard to say, it will sound awkward to read. The rhythm records awkward phrases, talking too long, and the same sentence repeated. We hear it. What the eye misses, the ear tends to pick up.
The last thought: deep characters grow from emotional honesty into emotional dissonance and deeper shortcomings, with each new instance of reality. Genuine dialogue depends on restraint, subtext, and different voices. When readers have the illusion that you would let your characters leave the other side of the page and live — arguing, loving, failing, apologizing — then you create something that makes sense.
Connect With Alan
Comments