top of page

Bold Decisions That Forced My Company To Grow Up

  • Feb 20
  • 2 min read

By Shawn Jahromi, FMVA, MBA, DBA Candi.


This year, my boldest decision was to leave secure work that no longer aligned with my firm’s values.


For over a decade, I led digital transformation projects for global brands in gaming, transportation, and healthcare. Demand was steady and retainers reliable, but the work no longer reflected market direction or the evolution leaders needed.


Boards often contacted me after failed projects, repeatedly asking why continued technology investments left their institutions more fragile, not stronger. This prompted me to formalize a new discipline: Institutional Sovereignty. This pre-governance, pre-transformation approach addresses one core issue: who truly authors the rules within an organization.


To pursue this direction, I made a choice most advisors avoid. I stopped accepting generic transformation work, even from prominent clients. I declined several six-figure projects that appeared credible but did not advance institutional sovereignty.


The first few months tested my conviction as revenue declined, which I anticipated. However, over the next six months, our average engagement size grew, boardroom access expanded, and discussions shifted from tool selection to existential risk, power, and long-term value. The lesson was clear: bold clients are not attracted by cautious positioning. Aligning your offerings with your core beliefs gives the market a clear reason to engage.


Fear arises with every significant decision. I treat it as data, not a verdict, and follow a three-step process before committing.


First, I define the hard floor by assessing the exact impact on my company, team, and personal life if the decision fails, using specific numbers and dates. Second, I identify the credible upside and the strategic position success would create. Third, I evaluate whether the decision increases or decreases my company’s sovereignty. If it enhances our ability to set our own strategy, I proceed.


Once the analysis is complete, I set a deadline and execute. I share my decision logic with the team to demonstrate that courage involves disciplined exposure to intelligent risk.


My primary leadership principle for 2026 is clear: author the rules, or someone else will.


Leaders must avoid outsourcing their thinking to vendors, algorithms, or committees that dilute responsibility. They should establish their own doctrine for using artificial intelligence, data, and capital before engaging partners. Leaders must also communicate clearly to their teams what they stand for and what work they will not accept, even at short-term cost.


Growth becomes a byproduct of alignment. Your team understands the purpose behind your decisions, clients recognize the outcomes you deliver, and partners know which proposals you will not consider. This focus allows you to concentrate on the few actions that reshape the landscape.


Bold leadership in the coming cycle is not defined by public statements, but by private decisions that reclaim authorship. When leaders operate with this clarity, their strategies become more profitable and durable.


Connect With Shawn

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page